Stuart A. Davidson

Stuart A. Davidson


I zealously fight for the rights of defrauded consumers and aggrieved shareholders, whether the case is big or small.


Stuart Davidson is a partner in Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP’s Boca Raton office. His practice focuses on complex consumer class actions, including cases involving deceptive and unfair trade practices, privacy and data breach issues, and antitrust violations.

Stuart served as class counsel in one of the earliest privacy cases, Kehoe v. Fidelity Federal Bank & Trust, where he represented half-a-million Florida drivers against a national bank for purchasing their private information from the state department of motor vehicles for marketing purposes, in violation of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act. His efforts resulted in a seminal privacy decision on damages by the Eleventh Circuit, 421 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1051 (2006), and after years of hard-fought litigation, including an appeal to the United States Supreme Court, he was able to obtain a $50 million recovery for the class. He was also integral in obtaining a settlement valued at $15 million in In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, concerning claims related to the massive data breach of Sony’s PlayStation Network, and currently serves as Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel in In re American Medical Collection Agency, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation in the District of New Jersey on behalf of LabCorp customers, and as a member of the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in In re Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation in the Northern District of California regarding the largest data breach in history. Stuart is actively involved in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, concerning Facebook’s alleged privacy violations through its collection of user’s biometric identifiers without informed consent, a cutting-edge nationwide privacy consumer class action in California. 

Most recently, Stuart was appointed to the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in In re Intel Corp. CPU Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, which concerns serious security vulnerabilities – known as “Spectre” and “Meltdown” – that infect nearly all of Intel’s x86 processors manufactured and sold since 1995, the patching of which results in processing speed degradation of the impacted computer, server or mobile device. Stuart also currently serves as co-lead counsel for hundreds of retired NHL players in In re NHL Players’ Concussion Injury Litigation in the District of Minnesota, and is spearheading several aspects of In re EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation in the District of Kansas, a case involving the illegal monopolization of the epinephrine auto-injector market, which allowed the prices of the life-saving EpiPen to rise over 600% in 9 years, and where Robbins Geller named partner Paul J. Geller was appointed co-lead counsel.

Stuart previously served as court-appointed co-lead counsel in In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation, a multidistrict consumer class action in the District of New Jersey, where he represented thousands of aggrieved pet owners nationwide against some of the nation’s largest pet food manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, which settled for $24 million. He also served as co-lead counsel in In re UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which settled for $25 million just weeks before trial. Additionally, he served as co-lead counsel in In re Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, recovering $11.5 million for former Winn-Dixie shareholders following the corporate buyout by BI-LO, and in In re AuthenTec, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, recovering $10 million for former AuthenTec shareholders following a merger with Apple, the two largest merger and acquisition recoveries in Florida history. 

Some of Stuart’s notable cases include: In re EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Mktg., Sales Practices & Antitrust Litig., No. 17-md-2785-DDC-TJJ, 2020 WL 1180550 (D. Kan. Mar. 10, 2020); Gardner v. Starkist Co., No. 19-CV-02561-WHO, 2019 WL 6698109 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2019); Skochin v. Genworth Life Ins. Co., No. 3:19-CV-49, 2019 WL 4126502 (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2019); Patel v. Facebook, Inc., 932 F.3d 1264 (9th Cir. 2019); Dolan v. JetBlue Airways Corp., 385 F. Supp. 3d 1338 (S.D. Fla. 2019); Stafford v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 3:17-cv-1340-AJB-JLB, 2018 WL 4680043 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2018); Dent v. NFL, 902 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 2018); Friedman v. AARP, Inc., 283 F. Supp. 3d 873 (C.D. Cal. 2018); In re Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., No. 16-MD-02752-LHK, 2017 WL 3727318 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2017)Friedman v. AARP, Inc., 855 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2017); Evans v. Ariz. Cardinals Football Club LLC, No. C 16-01030 WHA, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86207 (N.D. Cal. July 1, 2016); In re NHL Players’ Concussion Injury Litig., 189 F. Supp. 3d 856 (D. Minn. 2016); In re NHL Players’ Concussion Injury Litig., MDL No. 14-2551 (SRN), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38755 (D. Minn. Mar. 25, 2015); Dumont v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. 12 Civ. 2677 (ER), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29787 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 2015); Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 960 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (M.D. Fla. 2013); In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 903 F. Supp. 2d 942 (S.D. Cal. 2012); In re Clorox Consumer Litig., 894 F. Supp. 2d 1224 (N.D. Cal. 2012); In re Compellent Techs, Inc. S’holder Litig., No. 6084-VCL, 2011 WL 6382523 (Del. Ch. Dec. 9, 2011); All Family Clinic of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 448 F. App’x 906 (11th Cir. 2011); In re Pet Food Prods. Liab. Litig., 629 F.3d 333 (3d Cir. 2010); Penzer v. Transp. Ins. Co., 605 F.3d 1112 (11th Cir. 2010); Penzer v. Transp. Ins. Co., 29 So. 3d 1000 (Fla. 2010); Frankle v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., 609 F. Supp. 2d 841 (D. Minn. 2009); In re NationsRent Rental Fee Litig., No. 06-60924-CIV, 2009 WL 636188 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 24, 2009); Neighborhood Health P’ship, Inc. v. Peter F. Merkle, M.D., P.A., 8 So. 3d 1180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009); Tampa Serv. Co. v. Hartigan, 966 So. 2d 465 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007); Kehoe v. Fid. Fed. Bank & Trust, 421 F.3d 1209 (11th Cir. 2005); and In re JCC Holding Co. S’holder Litig., 843 A.2d 713 (Del. Ch. 2003).

Before joining the Firm, Stuart was an associate with the law firm of Geller Rudman, PLLC in Boca Raton, where he concentrated his practice on the prosecution of class actions. At Geller Rudman, Stuart handled numerous cases on behalf of shareholders of public corporations whose shares were to be acquired through leveraged buyouts, mergers, tender offers, and other “change of control” transactions, as well as derivative lawsuits filed against corporate boards, seeking to impose corporate governance reforms aimed at protecting shareholders and eliminating corporate waste and abuse. Stuart also represented consumers in numerous cases in which allegations of consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices were alleged. Additionally, Stuart was an associate at a private law firm in Boca Raton, where he gained substantial experience in all aspects of securities litigation, including SEC and NASD enforcement proceedings, securities regulatory proceedings by state and self-regulatory organizations, federal criminal securities fraud prosecutions, federal securities appellate litigation, and NASD customer arbitration proceedings, as well as acting as counsel for court-appointed receivers in complex federal securities and franchise litigation proceedings.

Stuart is a former lead assistant public defender in the Felony Division of the Broward County, Florida Public Defender’s Office. During his tenure at the Public Defender’s Office, he tried over 30 jury trials, conducted hundreds of depositions, handled numerous evidentiary hearings, engaged in extensive motion practice, and defended individuals charged with major crimes ranging from third-degree felonies to life and capital felonies. He has been quoted in numerous major media outlets regarding his cases, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, U.S. News & World Report, New York Daily News, the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, the Boston Globe, the Miami Herald, The Globe & Mail, and Law360, and is a frequent speaker at conferences involving class action practice and procedure.  

Stuart is a member of the Sedona Conference Working Group 11 Brainstorming Group, focusing on the California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) and defining and measuring damages under the U.S. privacy laws. He earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the State University of New York at Geneseo. Stuart earned a Juris Doctor degree from the Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law, where he graduated summa cum laude in the top 3% of his class. While in law school he was the Associate Editor for the Nova Law Review and was the recipient of Book Awards (highest grade) in Trial Advocacy, Criminal Pretrial Practice, and International Law. 

Practice Areas


Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law, J.D., 1996, summa cum laude

  • Graduated in the top 3% of his class
  • Associate Editor, Nova Law Review
  • Recipient of Book Awards (highest grade) in Trial Advocacy, Criminal Pretrial Practice, and International Law

State University of New York at Geneseo, B.A., 1993, Political Science


  • Florida
  • Minnesota
  • United States Supreme Court
  • United States Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits
  • United States District Courts for the Northern, Middle, and Southern Districts of Florida
  • United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
  • United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana
  • United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
  • United States District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Texas


Professional Affiliations

  • Member, Sedona Conference Working Group 11 Brainstorming Group
Main Menu