|
COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP FILES CLASS
ACTION SUIT AGAINST CERTAIN OFFICERS AND/OR DIRECTORS OF FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
September 8, 2008 – Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (“Coughlin Stoia”) (http://www.csgrr.com/cases/fanniemaeassoc/) today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) (NYSE:FNM) publicly traded securities during the period between November 16, 2007 and September 5, 2008, inclusive (the “Class Period”).
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff’s counsel, Samuel H. Rudman or David A. Rosenfeld of Coughlin Stoia at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at djr@csgrr.com. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.csgrr.com/cases/fanniemaeassoc/. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
The complaint charges certain of Fannie Mae’s officers and/or directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Fannie Mae is a shareholder-owned, government-sponsored enterprise of the United States federal government that is authorized to make loans and loan guarantees. It is the leading market-maker in the U.S. secondary mortgage market, which helps to replenish the supply of money for mortgages and enables money to be available for housing purchases.
The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements about Fannie Mae’s business and prospects and misrepresented the Company’s financial statements. These false and misleading statements cause Fannie Mae stock to trade at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching as high as $40.69 per share.
On July 7, 2008, a financial analyst at Lehman Brothers published a report suggesting that Fannie Mae might need to raise as much as $46 billion in capital, causing the Company’s stock price to plummet 16% in a single trading day. Following that disclosure, former St. Louis Federal Reserve Board President, William Poole, suggested that Fannie Mae was nearly insolvent and The New York Times disclosed that the federal government was making plans to place the Company into a conservatorship. On July 13, 2008, the Treasury Department announced that it was making a temporary line of credit available to Fannie Mae and would purchase an equity stake if necessary to provide more capital. From July 7 through July 14, 2008, Fannie Mae’s stock price declined over 48%. Finally, on Sunday, September 7, 2008, in the biggest government bail out in U.S. history, federal regulators seized control of Fannie Mae. On September 8, 2008, Fannie Mae stock opened at $1.91 per share, down from a close of $7.04 per share on September 5, 2008, a 72% decline.
According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, were as follows: (a) the decline in the U.S. housing market rendered Fannie Mae undercapitalized; (b) Fannie Mae’s December 2007 capital raise did not meet its capital needs; (c) Fannie Mae’s May 2008 capital raise did not meet its capital needs; (d) although Fannie Mae had more capital than its regulator required, it did not have “surplus capital” as defendants claimed; and (e) Fannie Mae’s publicly disclosed financial results misrepresented the financial condition of the Company.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of Fannie Mae publicly traded securities during the Class Period (the “Class”). The plaintiff is represented by Coughlin Stoia, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.
Coughlin Stoia, a 190-lawyer firm with offices in San Diego, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Boca Raton, Washington, D.C., Philadelphia and Atlanta, is active in major litigations pending in federal and state courts throughout the United States and has taken a leading role in many important actions on behalf of defrauded investors, consumers, and companies, as well as victims of human rights violations. The Coughlin Stoia Web site (http://www.csgrr.com) has more information about the firm.
Contact:
Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP
Samuel H. Rudman, 800-449-4900
David A. Rosenfeld
djr@csgrr.com
|